I’ve explored a number of sites on inspiration from classmates in previous courses, so I’m already familiar with a few fun ones like StumbleUpon, Flickr, LibraryThing, and Shelfari, but I’ve not used these with any particular attention to academic collaborative value, more from personal fun. This year, I’ve been using Evernote and “Read It Later” to bookmark and save pages and I began to have fun with Pinterest through the PUBLIB listserve. I think it has the potential to be a great site for libraries despite some recent publicity about giving up rights to anything you upload to the site.
In connection with my other course this semester, I found the following useful for research:
BibSonomy http://www.bibsonomy.org
Maintained by the University of Kassel, Germany, it’s easy to join and you can choose from various groups and “popular”. The site is run in German or English, and the contributions (as bookmarks and publications) are multilingual. This gives a real overview of what issues are current in which cultures.
So under the Group “Collaborative Knowledge Construction Challenge 2007” for instance, the articles cited below, posted to the group about a year and a half ago by a single contributor, can be seen w/abstract and directly called up Full Text .pdf via URI remote:
Kwak, H.; Lee, C.; Park, H. & Moon, S. (2010), What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?, in ‘WWW ’10: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web’ , ACM, New York, NY, USA , pp. 591–600 .
Lipczak, M. & Milios, E. (2010), The impact of resource title on tags in collaborative tagging systems, in ‘HT ’10: Proceedings of the 21st ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia’ , ACM, New York, NY, USA , pp. 179–188 .
Tags appear in the right hand panel, as well as group members (you can join some) and discussions.
Under “Popular” you can explore posts, discussions, specific authors, tags and concepts.
Exploring under popular posts (last 7 days vs. last 30 days & older) I came across an illustrated explanation of a PhD, which you can see here: http://matt.might.net/articles/phd-school-in-pictures/
Scroll down and you get to another delight: If it’s popular, people translate it! Look at the list!
Pros: scholarly and international content, which makes up for the …
Cons: some navigation annoyances when clicking on group URLs vs. name of group and the interface display visibility/discoverability needs getting used to. As a precaution, you are required to submit a CAPTCHA phrase TWICE (!) before bookmarking.
Compare to: Delicious (Delicious has lots of content-more mixed in popular and content rich, tags are easier to include in saved items. Visuals are attractive. I have a harder time sifting through themes in Delicious, but perhaps it’s because I’ve only just started exploring despite being aware of the tool for a few years.)
Diigo I need to explore more, but I like being able to highlight, share, make sticky notes on web pages etc. I think this is one I may want to use regularly.
Read Full Post »